Recently, China's new car evaluation procedures C-NCAP announced the collision results of the second batch of models in 2017, and we saw two recently popular hot red models - Guangzhou Automobile Chuanqi GS8 and Changan CS95. As the representative of domestic large and medium-sized SUVs, these two cars can not avoid a variety of contrasts, including the appearance of the interior, driving quality, price configuration, etc., but what about the security of the two? Is there a big difference? We together look.
GS8 and CS95 collision results
According to the latest C-NCAP evaluation rules, the total score of the collision reached 54 points, the collision score was five stars, GS8 and CS95 all achieved five-star results, but the GS8 with 57.7 points was slightly higher than Changan CS95's 54.1. Minute. Let's take a look at the scores of the two segments:
As can be seen from the above table, the GS8 and CS95 score the same in both the side collision and the plus item. The difference between the scores is 100% positive full collision and 40% offset collision. In addition, the seat whipping test also has Smaller difference.
In addition, it should be noted that the two models participating in the crash test are 2.0T two-wheel drive models, of which GAC Chuanqi GS8 belongs to the model that has been independently tested. The purchase price of C-NCAP is 182,800, while Changan CS95 belongs to the selected one. The children were selected for testing by the C-NCAP Management Center, and the purchase price of C-NCAP was 169,800.
Comparison of collision results of similar joint venture models
There are already a lot of medium and large-scale joint venture SUVs in the same level as GAC Chuanqi GS8 and Changan CS95, but C-NCAP has not tested much. Currently, only SAIC Volkswagen Tiguan L, Ford Sharp, Toyota Highlander These three cars are all tested for collision using the 2015 version of the rules, which is the same test rules as GS8 and CS95.
Judging from the evaluation scores, the five cars all received a 5-star rating, and from the score point of view, Chuanqi GS8's 57.7 points was the highest score among the six cars, followed by Ford's sharp 56.5 points. The Changan CS95 is close to the Volkswagen Tiguan L score. In the same evaluation rules, Chuanqi GS8 and CS95 did not have a significant gap with the joint-level products of the same level. It is true that this score cannot prove anything, but like the fuel consumption of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, although the data is different from the actual, it is based on the same The conditional test is still able to peep out one or two from it.
100% frontal collision analysis
In the 100% frontal collision project, the GS8 score is higher than that of the Changan CS95, but in the sub-evaluation of the frontal collision, the two are high and low, not the GS8 comprehensive overwhelming CS95. In general, the GS8 front row The score is higher than the CS95, but the CS95 score in the back row is higher than the GS8.
The GS8 and CS95 have a perfect score on the head and neck in the front row, but the GS8 in the chest and calf is higher than the Changan CS95. The main considerations for chest scores are compression deformation and viscous index. The calf is the reference tibia index and calf compression. These terms are too complicated for ordinary consumers. It is not necessary to know clearly. The lower the chance of injury, so the CS95 front occupant is relatively more vulnerable to injury in the chest and calf than the GS8. (C-NCAP picture quality is poor, please forgive me)
In the latter case, the CS95 score is higher than the GS8, especially in the chest. The CS95 score is much higher than the GS8, indicating that the GS8 is in a full frontal collision and the rear passenger is wearing a seat belt. The chest is more likely to be injured than the CS95.
40% offset collision
In the 40% offset collision project, the GS8 score is also higher than the Changan CS95. The 40% offset collision requires higher safety performance of the vehicle. Because the area of ​​the power dispersion is smaller than the 100% collision, the requirements for the body structure and the body material are higher. Of course, the harsher is the 25% small area offset. Collision, but C-NCAP has not yet introduced this test, only the US IIHS has been tested.
Although the naked eye did not appear to be significantly squeezed, the front row of internal space was basically maintained, but C-NCAP gave a score of 0.82 on the CS95's calf, compared to the GS8's 3.94 score, the gap is still very obvious. This shows that although the CS95 interior does not appear obvious concave, but the calf suffered a large impact during the collision process, that is to say, in the case of an offset collision, the CS95 front passenger's calf is more likely to be injured than the GS8.
Compared with the front row, the difference between the scores of the back row is smaller, but the CS95 comprehensively protects the passengers in the back row from the GS8. The GS8 is the front bump and the side bump, and the rear dummy's chest score. Must be lower than the GS8. However, both cars have pre-tensioning and force limiting functions for the front seat belts, and limited force for the rear row. The pre-tensioned seat belt can tighten the seat belt in advance when the vehicle detects possible collision and unstable body, eliminates the gap between the seat belt and the human body, reduces the displacement of the human chest forward, and further improves safety. .
Side collision
Both sides scored a perfect score of 18 points and the performance was good. However, this is also expected. In the 33 cars evaluated by C-NCAP in 2016, the average scoring rate of the side impact test reached 97.3%. To this end, C-NCAP has made adjustments to the new 2018 rules, making changes to the variable mobility barrier, improving the quality of its trolleys and the height of the center of the impact beam, making the test difficult. Currently GS8 and CS95 are still tested according to the old 2012 version of the rules.
Seat whipping
The seat whipping test tests whether the seat can adequately protect the occupant's neck when the vehicle is rear-ended. Because of the sudden impact of the rear car, the occupant is easily damaged by the combination of the acceleration of the collision and the inertia of the head. Both GS8 and CS95 performed well in this test, and the CS95 score was slightly higher than GS8.
bonus
Chuanqi SG8 and Changan CS95 scored 3 points (out of 5 points), both with front seat belt reminders, side airbags and side curtains and ESC. However, it should be noted that the GAC Chuanqi GS8 and the Changan GS8 are all equipped with a front and rear head air curtain. The lowest match is not equipped with a head air curtain. The head air curtain protects the head when it collides on the side. If there is no head, the head may collide with the window and cause damage.
to sum up
Although in terms of total score, Chuanqi GS8 is higher than Changan CS95, but we can find out that each test sub-item can be found. In fact, Chuanqi GS8 is not fully hanged CS95, in general, GS8 front row occupant protection Better than the CS95, but the CS95 rear occupant protection is better than the GS8, so it has its own characteristics. It is already very good to see that domestic large-scale SUVs can have such achievements. I hope that more domestic models will perform well in the crash test in the future.
Outdoor Full Color LED Display P5 Fixed installation, which widely used in Outdoor Advertising Projects, like Square, Station, Commercial Center, Street etc. Mainly used for outdoor high density picture display. Outdoor P5 LED Display Screen using the distribution and modular design to improve the stability of the LED Display P5 control system.
P5 LED Display, the pixel 40000dpts per square meter, large lighting angle, uniform heat dissipation, large angle, colorful and vivid. Using the distribution and modular design to improve the stablility of the system. Each of the light-emitting points are red, green, blue, which display body with computer as control center, with perfect program production software and playing software, electronic display screen and display window to form one.
1) Stronger protection: LED chips are welded on the PCB board directly, then do encapsulation. It has excellent protection capabilities.
2) Higher reliability and stability: simpler process on material using and producing than SMD, so it has higher performance on heat dissipation to prolong life span.
3) Larger viewing angle: has larger viewing angle and is easy to control the loss of light refraction.
High IP rating & perfect heat dissipation, IP65 water resistance and safety performance. having fans inside, which can improve the heat dissipation efficiently to ensure good and stable play performance.
Looking forward your early response and cooperation!
P5 Fixed Outdoor,P5 Led Display,P5 Outdoor Led Display,Programmable Led Display
Shenzhen Jongsun Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.jongsunled.com