Final trial VSD1 price/performance theory

The overall sound quality and matching of VSD1 have been introduced before, and finally we will select a few judges and make a final judgment on VSD1. The price in the judges is higher than VSD1. The VSD1 is lower. Whether we can pass the final trial, let us wait and see.

The judges are divided into three levels:

Lower judge (price below VSD1): Apple Xiaobai, JVCFX8, Shengmei ES20

Intermediate judge (price above or equal to VSD1 but not more than 500): Sennheiser CX200, iron triangle ckm500, somic MH407

Ultimate judge: UE900

Trial home platform: XPLAY

Judge 1: Apple White

To be honest, Xiaobai should not be in this game, because Xiaobai is not comparable to flat-headed plugs, but many of the first-time burns may have only heard of Xiaobai without a basis for judgment. SO has pulled the little white teeth this time.

Appearance of work: VSD1 wins, there is no problem in winning the plain white.

Wearing comfort: VSD1 wins, people with flat head thiophene for more than 1 hour know that it will be a little painful to wear the ear continuously. Although the small white cavity is small, it will be uncomfortable for a long time. The original comfort of the VSD1 is generally changed. The soft set is very comfortable.

Sound insulation: VSD1 wins. VSD1 changed the brothers and then all the headphones I have heard are the first few soundproofing. Xiaobai is sometimes difficult to hear on the street.

Easy to drive: flat

Analytical resolution: VSD1 wins. This gap is a bit big.

Tri-band: VSD1 is fully suppressed, to tell the truth, one ear difference.

Sound field: This little white win, because it is a flat plug

Tuning: The tuning of VSD1 is a bit low frequency, but the midrange is good. The voice is good. As long as it is not a particularly noisy song, the popular performance is good, and Xiaobai inherits the consistent style of Apple, and it is true.

Pure, transparent: small white wins, also because it is flat plug

Three-dimensional sound: VSD1, although the flat plug has an advantage in the three-dimensional sound, but the VSD1 win is still appropriate.

Conclusion: Xiaobai is defeated.

Judge 2: JVCFX8

In fact, sometimes the plug of an ear gap is really meaningless. But since I gave the FX8 judge the authority, let it do it.

Appearance: VSD1 wins. There is a sense of design and no sense of design

Wearing comfort: flat, very comfortable

Sound insulation: VSD1 wins. In fact, FX8 is also ok with a large set of soundproofing, but overall it is still good for VSD1.

Easy to drive: VSD1 wins, but they are all pushable, but VSD1 is a little better.

Analytical resolution: VSD1 wins. One ear difference, FX8 is not well resolved. The sound is quite lacking in tension. The sound density is not good and lacks tension, it is very difficult to infect people. VSD1 is much better.

Tri-band: VSD1 is completely suppressed, and it is also an ear difference.

Sound field: VSD1 wins, FX8 sound field is a bit hollow, always feel that the singer is far away, but it is not the open kind of hollow. Uncomfortable.

Tuning: The tuning of VSD1 is a bit low frequency, but the midrange is good. The vocals are good. As long as it is not a particularly noisy song, the popular performance is good, and the FX8 wants to go balanced, but it is too dull and more than Xiaobai. To be dull, I feel that the plane is very lacking in three-dimensionality.

Pure sense, transparency: VSD1 wins, in fact, FX8 low frequency is not much, it should have an advantage in this respect, but because the overall quality is not high, sometimes it will be vague.

Three-dimensional sound: VSD1 wins.

Ending: FX8 is defeated

Judge 3: Sound beauty ES20

"Hey, the first two goods, are you coming to soy sauce, it's too easy to lose." Well, the team leader of the next-level judge finally came into battle. As a 150-time good price-performance ES20, can you organize VSD1? The pace of progress. The answer can now give everyone "NO!"

Appearance work: VSD1 wins, independent design sense to imitation show.

Wearing comfort: flat, comfortable to wear~

Sound insulation: VSD1 wins.

Easy to drive: VSD1 wins, in fact, it is all good to push.

Analytical resolution: VSD1 wins. I thought the gap was not big, but it was found to be quite big. It can be considered as an ear gap. Even songs with less complicated accompaniment such as KOKIA's "Begin" can hear the details of VSD1. It's more obvious than the ES20. Not to mention those noisy electronic or large compilations.

Tri-band: VSD1 wins, more obvious. ES20 is balanced, the whole sounds very comfortable, especially when the volume is turned up, it will not make you feel awkward. ES20 high frequency is actually brighter than VSD1, the biggest difference is In the intermediate frequency, the difference in sound density is obvious, which leads to the ES20 having certain advantages in the interpretation of pure KOKIA, but Cai Qin, GAGA, etc. are all inferior.

Sound field: unexpectedly the ES20 won.

Tuning: The tuning of VSD1 is a bit low frequency, but the midrange is good. The voice is good. As long as it is not a particularly noisy song, the popular performance is good. The ES20 is quite balanced, slightly higher than the high frequency.

Pure, transparent: ES20 wins, it is good in purity, but pure is too thin

Three-dimensional sound: VSD1 wins, more obvious, ES20 is still too flat.

Conclusion: Although the ES20 is still unsuccessful, the gap is not as big as imagined.

Intermediate trial area:

Judge 4: CX200

CX200, the official offer is about 300 music, but Taobao can generally win around 200. But this CX200 let me feel that it is cheating to enter the middle-level field. Why do you think there is no ES20 good...

Appearance work: VSD1 wins, CX200's shape is actually quite special, but I don't think it looks good.

Wearing comfort: flat, very comfortable

Sound insulation: VSD1 wins. CX200 should choose the pair of earmuffs, after the large brother set, the sound insulation is very good, with the original soundproofing.

Easy to drive: VSD1 wins, but they are all pushable, but VSD1 is a little better.

Analytical resolution: VSD1 wins. It is also an ear difference, there is a big gap in the details.

Tri-band: VSD1 is fully suppressed, and it is also an ear difference. The CX series is known for its low frequency. It is true that if the size of the silicone sleeve is chosen to be a low frequency, it is quite a lot, but the quality is generally the same. VSD1 low-frequency texture and volume are OK. The intermediate frequency The biggest difference is that the sound density of VSD1 is completely suppressed by CX200. The high frequency is also slightly better than VSD1.

Sound field: Ping, does not belong to the kind of sound field.

Tuning: Both tunings are low-frequency, but obviously the tuning of VSD1 is wider and better. The CX200 appears to be low-frequency bloated and affects other frequency bands.

Pure, transparent: VSD1 wins.

Three-dimensional sound: VSD1 wins. This is obvious.

Conclusion: CX200 is defeated. Many Taobao homes also sell 199 prices, but much weaker than VSD1.

Judge 5: Iron Triangle ckm500

The CX200's fiasco has put a lot of pressure on other judges in the middle-level field, and the second one is the CKM500, which is worth more than twice the VSD1.

CX200, the official offer is about 300 music, but Taobao can generally win around 200. But this CX200 let me feel that it is cheating to enter the middle-level field. Why do you think there is no ES20 good...

Appearance of work: CKM500 wins, still feels that the CKM500 goblin-like shape and workmanship is great today.

Wearing comfort: CKM500 wins, in fact, very comfortable, but if only the original set, CKM500 silicone sleeve is more comfortable than VSD1 silicone sleeve.

Sound insulation: VSD1 wins. CKM500 is not bad, but VSD1 is slightly better.

Easy to drive: VSD1 wins, but they are all pushable, but VSD1 is a little better.

Analytical resolution: VSD1 wins. Finally, it is not an ear difference. You need to listen carefully to get conclusions. After careful comparison, it is decided to award the victory of the analytical separation war to VSD1. In fact, the gap is not very large. I heard that many of the live soundtracks such as "I am a singer" can find that the noises heard by VSD1 will be more clear, and Zhou Huajian's comprehension of the live version is the same, as in the case of classical music, for example. Brahms's "First Symphony" is accompanied by the drum sound and the roar of the brass tube. The violin's subtle overtones, or the positioning of the strings, the violin and harp's plucking clarity, etc. are still VSD1's winning and obvious.

Tri-band: VSD1 wins. The low frequency is good or not, whether it is quality or quantity is VSD1, or the first part of the first movement of Brahms "First Symphony", VSD1 can feel the vibration of the tympanic membrane, and the copper tube The instrument will not be very messy, and the CKM500 is completely chaotic. I think this is also the reason why the CKM500 is slightly stuffy. The CKM500 of the medium frequency is good, so I feel very good with it, but even the intermediate frequency or VSD1 wins. As for the high frequency, the two are not very good. There is a certain tooth tone of the CKM500.

Sound field: Ping, does not belong to the kind of sound field.

Tuning: CKM500 wants to go balanced, but because the low-frequency texture is not good, it sounds rather boring. While VSD1 is mainly low frequency, it does not feel very stuffy.

Pure, transparent: VSD1 wins.

Three-dimensional sound: VSD1 wins.

Conclusion: The CKM500 is actually smaller than the previous plugs in VSD1. But overall, VSD1 wins a bit.

Judge 6: MH407

As the captain of the middle-level field, it is indeed a plug that is worth less than 400. Because it has been tested by MH407 before, it defeated CKM500, so the final battle of this intermediate field was handed over to MH407.

Appearance work: Ping, this tangled for a while, the style gap is relatively large, the work is a good point of VSD1, but the overall looks too uncomfortable and MH407 a bit sigh.

Wearing comfort: VSD1 wins, if you use the original set of MH407 comfort, but changed the brother set immediately turned over.

Sound insulation: VSD1 wins. Of course, it is the original set, if you change the brother set MH407, it will be counterattacked.

Easy to drive: MH407, also very good push, but MH407 is easier to push.

Analytical resolution: MH407 wins, the same is to listen to Brahms just now, this time MH407 heard the player I did not notice before hit the music of the music stand, and the layering of the instrument is more vivid. Of course moving iron The advantage is analysis.

Tri-band: This can't be judged by the truth, because the advantage of MH407 is obvious, and the shortcomings are obvious. VSD1 is low frequency, MH407 is high frequency. To be honest, MH407 is a bit extreme, and the high frequency is quite beautiful. For example, just now Rams, the beginning of the first movement with other plugs, is the drum and the copper tube to suppress the whole audience. But the MH407 is the string is very grand, but the texture of the low frequency of the moving iron is easily distorted, resulting in The drum and the copper tube were suppressed. For example, the color black of Ji Ke Yi Yi, the low frequency part of the front, the low frequency of MH407 can hear the elasticity is really good, but the texture is too distorted. The part of the medium frequency vocal, MH407 The tooth sound is really strong enough, much more than just the CKM500. But the vocal texture is not weak, quite scratching the ear, much more than the VSD1. I tried to bring these two plugs when taking the subway. In the noisy environment, MH407 should be more irritating to my senses than VSD1. But in the family, MH407 is a bit too old, and it will be a little too exciting for a long time. I want to increase the volume for a while. I want to lower it. If you use super girl to describe it, feel MH407

Sound field: Ping, does not belong to the kind of sound field.

Tuning: This is also said before, the opposite of the tuning.

Pure sense, transparency: MH407 wins. To be honest, the moving iron should be purer in general. However, due to the somewhat over-exaggerated MH407, the original small fresh becomes a heavy makeup. But the overall MH407 is a little bit transparent.

Three-dimensional sound: Ping. There is a certain three-dimensional sense.

Summary: I won't be able to draw conclusions in this game. If I am myself, I prefer MH407, which is more stimulating to the senses. But to be honest, not everyone likes this kind of excitement. VSD1 seems to be more stable.

Ultimate judge: UE900

Finally, at the end of the final, the judge Grand Devil UE900 finally debut, and is an upgraded version of UE900....

Appearance work: UE900, UE900's bright slogan I am afraid that few people do not agree, but UE900 work is not very good. But the overall UE900 won.

Wearing comfort: flat, very comfortable.

Sound insulation: flat, can do bus and subway without pressure.

Easy to drive: flat, all push straight without pressure

Analytical resolution: UE900 wins, when listening to the popular, although the gap is quite obvious, but not as big as I imagined, but it is more obvious when listening to the symphony. No need to repeat too much.

Tri-band: UE900 wins. In the UE900 tri-band will not declare the master, and VSD1 will sometimes be like this. Or Brahms, although VSD1 and CKM500 will not feel particularly sticky at the beginning of the first movement, but in Compared with the UE900, I still feel that the copper tube is a bit arrogant, and the UE900 can make you feel that the string is the main character of the copper tube is the atmosphere. The UE900 is also moving iron, but the low frequency is not as distorted as MH407. Not as good as VSD1. The overall quality of the intermediate frequency is worse than VSD1, and the sound density is larger, so it sounds more textured. The high frequency, the extension and brightness of the UE900 is better than VSD1. Overall, it is all-round suppression. But the truth is not the difference. It’s as big as I imagined.

Sound field: Ping, does not belong to the kind of sound field.

Tuning: UE900 goes balanced, VSD1 is low frequency.

Pure, transparent: UE900 wins

Three-dimensional sound: UE900. There is a certain three-dimensional sense, but obviously UE900 is more full, there is blood and flesh, and VSD1 makes people feel that it is thinner than UE900.

Summary: UE900 won, but the truth is not as big as I thought. After all, the difference is about 9 times more.

Final judgment:

The most cost-effective link that everyone cares about, can VSD1 achieve 200 seconds, win 600, and level 1000. I think everyone should not be too concerned about this slogan. I always think, don't always think about it. 100 yuan can get 500 dollars, as long as the value for money is OK. I remember that Yu Shao said that VSD1 must beat all the plugs below 400. My feeling is even 360 MH407, VSD1 can't be said to be a win, but at most it has its own advantages. But the slogan is one aspect of cost performance and another aspect. As far as this 199 plug is concerned, I personally feel that the price/performance ratio is indeed ok, and it is more than twice its own price. Compared with the products, I can do it without falling. I think this price/performance ratio is very good. Even though I think the second is 200, the slogan of the 1000 Shenma is not too serious. But if someone asks me what is worth below 200? Recommended, I think I am still willing to recommend VSD1 and VSD1S, and I have already done this. But it is still impossible to please dispel all kinds of thoughts.